glyphosate

SAVED: PAGE: ACTIVE AREA:
Agricultural Holdings Brexit Crofting Crops Dairy Environment & Land Use Food Supply Chain Legal Livestock Pigs and PoultrySupport Payments & Grants
Title:
Type ID:
7
Type:
Slider
ID:
87
Active:
True
Parent:
1
Pos:
0
Style:
Title:
Type ID:
4
Type:
News Feed
ID:
0
Active:
True
Parent:
2
Pos:
0
Style:
Title:
Type ID:
2
Type:
Image
ID:
355
Active:
True
Parent:
4
Pos:
0
Style:
Title:
Type ID:
1
Type:
Text
ID:
448
Active:
True
Parent:
3
Pos:
0
Style:
Title:
Type ID:
1
Type:
Text
ID:
529
Active:
True
Parent:
1
Pos:
1
Style:
Title:
Type ID:
1
Type:
Text
ID:
446
Active:
True
Parent:
3
Pos:
1
Style:
Title:
Type ID:
1
Type:
Text
ID:
447
Active:
True
Parent:
3
Pos:
2
Style:
Just Two Weeks Left to Win a Scholar Place at Prestigious Oxford Conference

16-08-2018

With just a fortnight to go until the deadline NFU Scotland members are being encouraged to not let the opportunity to...

Read More...
Potato Working Group Chairman's Blog - 16 August

16-08-2018

With the main tattie harvest looming Scotland may have fared better than other parts of the UK and Europe with the...

Read More...
Union Calls for ‘Stability and Simplicity’ to Look Further into the Future

15-08-2018

In an extensive and comprehensive response to the consultation: ‘Stability and Simplicity: Proposals for Rural Funding Transition Period’ the Union has...

Read More...

Glyphosate - Call to Action


The re-authorisation of a herbicide is not typically the subject of heated debate in the media and corridors of power, but glyphosate is no ordinary plant protection product (PPP) and this is no ordinary time for science and the regulation of PPP. The world’s most widely used herbicide, glyphosate, is  inextricably linked in some people’s minds with genetic modification and agrochemical giant Monsanto.

Its re-authorisation has come after years of feverish debate in Brussels about the process and criteria for assessing and authorising PPP. This is a hazard (rather than the more logical risk) based process, where a new active substance will typically cost around €200million to bring to market through the various regulatory hurdles, and where scientific analysis is often contested and ignored.

The consequences of this unfortunate set of circumstance were evident on 27 June 2016, when – with the attention of the world turned to the EU referendum result the previous day – the decision was taken to re-authorise glyphosate for up to 18 months rather than the usual 15 years. This decision – some might say a political fudge – was bitterly disappointing given the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and World Health Organisation (WHO) had both said it was unlikely to cause cancer.

Whilst this conclusion was not shared by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), it has recently been upheld by a major report from the European Chemical Agency (ECHA).

Now that the ECHA has reported its findings, the fate of glyphosate is in the hands of European Union member states, the European Commission and the European Parliament.

Given that glyphosate has now been given as much of a clean bill of health as any PPP is likely to get, and given its fundamental importance to farmers and crofters across Scotland, NFU Scotland is calling on its members to get involved in the effort to ensure that it is re-authorised for a full 15-year period when it is considered again by EU member states and institutions later this year.

There are campaigns being run to stop the re-authorisation of glyphosate, so it is vital the decision makers in Edinburgh, London and Brussels hear a different point of view – from those who have most to lose should glyphosate not be re-authorised.

What you can do to help

  • Contact your MSPs, MPs, and MEPs to explain to them the environmental and economic importance of glyphosate to you and your farm or croft
  • Invite your politicians onto your farm or croft to see the environmental and economic value of glyphosate first hand
  • Use social media to post photos and key non-technical points about the environmental and economic importance of glyphosate. Remember to use the hashtag #glyphosateisvital
  • Where appropriate, encourage your friends and neighbours to take the actions above.

Contact details of your MSPs, MPs and MEPs can be found at www.writetothem.com


Five reasons to back glyphosate




1.  Effective and efficient control of weeds leads to better agricultural yields, which reduces the need for imported food










2.  Glyphosate is a fundamental part of low or no tillage farming, which has many benefits for soils, biodiversity and water quality









3.  There is overwhelming scientific agreement that, when used correctly, glyphosate is safe for humans










4.  Glyphosate is a valuable pre-harvest tool which reduces the need for grain drying, with a consequently positive reduction in the need for fossil fuels








5.  Glyphosate is no longer patented, meaning no one company is controlling it nor profiting from it.

©NFU Scotland • All Rights Reserved • Website presented on Big RedLog in

Close

Contact Us

 

 

 

No Robots:

This form collects and sends the information supplied to NFU Scotland. You can read our privacy policy for full details on how we protect and manage your data.
  I consent to having NFU Scotland collect the above details.